kyute_shana Posted January 25, 2009 Report Share Posted January 25, 2009 yep..me too..and she needs to look a little more intimidating.. but it's just a manip anyway..maybe Dakota's ok..:/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paint the sky grey Posted January 25, 2009 Report Share Posted January 25, 2009 I was already disappointed of some character choices of Twilight. - Laurent - totally wrong actor. Or Eric, Angela...But I think in New Moon it's not gonna be better. The Alec candits are the same shit like the Jane choice. Tom Felton - he's nothing to do with Twilight. He's the Harry Potter face. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyute_shana Posted January 25, 2009 Report Share Posted January 25, 2009 haha..Eric was definitely wrong for me..Angela was ok..but idk lacked more kindness in her looks..I like tom..but he's not for twilight.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paint the sky grey Posted January 25, 2009 Report Share Posted January 25, 2009 It's not that I dislike Tom, just like I already said, he's a Harry Potter character. Angela was okay, yes. But I expected more a black girl or someone like that for her role. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyute_shana Posted January 25, 2009 Report Share Posted January 25, 2009 yeah..he belongs to harry potter and harry potter only..lmao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kristen Posted January 25, 2009 Report Share Posted January 25, 2009 This is totally not that how I would Jane imagine to be.^^ It doesn't fit. Much too young. Too young? Jane was very young when she was turned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indabisofmisery Posted January 25, 2009 Report Share Posted January 25, 2009 yeah..he belongs to harry potter and harry potter only..lmao aww poor kid got typecast as an hp character!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miranda:] Posted January 25, 2009 Report Share Posted January 25, 2009 Too young? Jane was very young when she was turned. yeah she wasn't an older person yet. she was petty young. but dakota seems tooo young. like she has that baby face still. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laura.RIOT! Posted January 25, 2009 Report Share Posted January 25, 2009 ;988487']yeah she wasn't an older person yet. she was petty young.but dakota seems tooo young. like she has that baby face still. i think with all the make up and stuff they'll use, she'll probably look a lot older. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x-Decode Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 dakotas exactly how i thought jane would look like. i thought angela would be looking kinda like laurant...but less evil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miranda:] Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 i think with all the make up and stuff they'll use, she'll probably look a lot older. yeah that may be true. but something about her i can't see her as a like idk. i don't think she would fit in twilight. like it's serious and i still see her as a actress in the funny comical films. i can't explain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watchthesky Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 i can't see her in it either not just because she doesn't physically look the part, i just honestly can't picture her being attatched to it i really really really can't she's a great actress and everything she's just not twilight material Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laura.RIOT! Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 i cant see her in it tbh either. to me she still seems a bit too young. but hey, everyone hated it when rob got announced as edward, or so i was told, and everyone LOVES him now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kristen Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 Well she pulled off being creepy for the movie Hide and Seek. But I have this image of her in my head in Uptown Girls haha. She seems to fit the description of Jane, besides her hair being light blonde. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paint the sky grey Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 Too young? Jane was very young when she was turned. Yes, I know. Dunno, but Dakota doesn't fit to the role in my opinion anyway. I imagined Jane as a young (not so young like Dakota - maybe 1,2 years older) girl with red short hair or something like that... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kristen Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 Jane's description: Very tiny with lank, pale brown hair trimmed short. Rather slim and androgynous figure with a face too pretty for a boy. She has wide-eyes, full-lips and a child-like voice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paint the sky grey Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 Jane's description: Very tiny with lank, pale brown hair trimmed short. Rather slim and androgynous figure with a face too pretty for a boy. She has wide-eyes, full-lips and a child-like voice. Aw yeah, right. It's been a while ago since I read it, so could be that I mixed something up with another book's parts. Anyway, we'll see how Dakota will succeed (?) in her role. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miranda:] Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 i can't see her in it eithernot just because she doesn't physically look the part, i just honestly can't picture her being attatched to it i really really really can't she's a great actress and everything she's just not twilight material yes, same here. thats how i feel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watchthesky Posted January 27, 2009 Report Share Posted January 27, 2009 i cant see her in it tbh either. to me she still seems a bit too young.but hey, everyone hated it when rob got announced as edward, or so i was told, and everyone LOVES him now. well thats cause people are stupid haha i never understood that i loved him right from the start nikki was the only one i was kind of iffy about Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanguis Dominus Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 I think the bird in this and Jeffery Dahmer would get on well. Both are necrophilliacs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 ^ Your sig wins. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanguis Dominus Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 Heh, thanks. 'Parently it's too offensive and "not right" for a desktop in the graphics contest, though. Was tempted to add "My Parafamily: Parafuhrer: Adolf Hitler Joeseph Goebbles Heinrich Himmler Hermann Göring" But it dawned on me that some people might take it as less than a joke, and actually assume I was a neo-NAZI, or something.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waketheearth Posted January 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 THIS GUY WAS SECOND PLACE TO ROB FOR THE ROLE OF EDWARD! not even gunna lie, i probably wouldnt have loved the movie as much if he were edward haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reaglephoenix Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 ha. haha. I don't really have anything to say. That was just funny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanguis Dominus Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 The whole story of the unpopular girl falling in love with the popular boy, who turns out to be something different is really pretty generic, though... isn't it? It'd be worth watching/reading if the vampire was more of a vampire and just wasted her. Is there even any blood in it? I mean... that'd mean it's essentially a vampire film, without any blood. That's like like having a Star Wars film without lasers. Or a WWII film without any weapons. Or an Aliens film without any aliens. Or a Resident Evil film without any zombies. Or a Terminator film without Arnie... oh, wait, forget the last one. Still, you get the idea. Also, why are there pictures of them outside, during the daytime? Shouldn't the vampire burn, or something? Bet there's a scene with that vampire eating garlic in a church, before washing it down with some holy water. I've known hematophobics that are more vampiric than anything in that film... I think I remember hearing that she was underage, too. That'd make him a pedophilie as well as her already being a necrophilliac. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.