Andrew Posted July 2, 2008 Report Share Posted July 2, 2008 If you think the magazine is bad, then don't think about watching the tv channel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiroki Posted July 2, 2008 Report Share Posted July 2, 2008 If you think the magazine is bad, then don't think about watching the tv channel Thats even worse and isn't even anything to do with Kerrang! which makes it even worse. Channel 4 own that crapola Scuzz is getting as bad as Kerrang! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Posted July 2, 2008 Report Share Posted July 2, 2008 Scuzz is getting as bad as Kerrang! True. I usually just stick with MTV2... no wait MTVTWO... But Scuzz did have some Download festival coverage, but Judas Priest totally had no idea what Scuzz was when they interviewed them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiroki Posted July 2, 2008 Report Share Posted July 2, 2008 It's a bloody shame as both MTV2 and Scuzz used to be quiet decent you were always guaranteed to see a few good bands instead of the "flavour of the week" bands Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Posted July 2, 2008 Report Share Posted July 2, 2008 It's a bloody shame as both MTV2 and Scuzz used to be quiet decent you were always guaranteed to see a few good bands instead of the "flavour of the week" bands Original Scuzz was awesome when they had Mullet Man (those ads were glorious :hyper:) and the red button stuff... then it got taken over and completely changed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jadeAMORE Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 Why are you wasting cash on it if you don't like it? The posters are pretty good. And I like to laugh at some of the press written in it. xD They're not bad for EVERYTHING. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiroki Posted July 4, 2008 Report Share Posted July 4, 2008 Haha that's ok then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chriscool Posted July 5, 2008 Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 Yup and it's like anything the more cover space you want and the more positive reviews your after the more money and perks you have to give to the magazine and it's reviews. Which people have started to realize and is why Kerrang! only appeals to kids now. That explains why Cancer Bats are getting a load of coverage atm, including a cover and 5K album. Oh wait. And I don't really see what the big fuss about the review is. Its one person's opinion which they are entitled too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiroki Posted July 6, 2008 Report Share Posted July 6, 2008 I don't understand your point about Cancer Bats....explain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chriscool Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 What I meant was there wasn't exactly alot of Cancer Bats adverts before they were put on the cover. Same with Converge before today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jorgi Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 Yeah but Converge are actually a fucking good band, Cancer Bats are not. ...For a start, who the hell names their band Cancer Bats ? Pshaw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.