watchthesky Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 well i mean they're both "images or films sexually depicting a child"is it the fact that he did it himself i guess? well not exactly from what i remember (which tbh isn't much) the photos that leaked of her before were mostly just her goofing off she was still covered up in the areas that matter and i don't think she expected anyone to see them that's a fairly normal thing for a teenage girl to do a grown man taking a normal picture and purposely making it look like she was partially naked and spreading them around for everyone to see is in a totally different league Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildman Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 I honestly think that we need to see that picture in order to judge. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasiek Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 I honestly think that we need to see that picture in order to judge. this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 It was shit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bornforthis___x Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 well not exactlyfrom what i remember (which tbh isn't much) the photos that leaked of her before were mostly just her goofing off she was still covered up in the areas that matter and i don't think she expected anyone to see them that's a fairly normal thing for a teenage girl to do a grown man taking a normal picture and purposely making it look like she was partially naked and spreading them around for everyone to see is in a totally different league well if he purposely altered them that is something totally different, yes. but if the pictures of her in her underwear or whatever weren't supposed to be seen and then tmz posts them anyway...also not right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott! Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 It's probably a horrible photoshop job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watchthesky Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 well if he purposely altered them that is something totally different, yes. but if the pictures of her in her underwear or whatever weren't supposed to be seen and then tmz posts them anyway...also not right. i never said it was right i'm just saying it's different Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildman Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 It's probably a horrible photoshop job. No doubt. Actually, I've been trying to find the picture, though I doubt I will, but I've been seeing some disturbing pictures of Miley on the search, so it can't be all that bad with the stuff that's already on the internet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 It's probably a horrible photoshop job. All it is is a big black square between her legs haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildman Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 As far as I know, it was just an upskirt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bornforthis___x Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 i never said it was right i'm just saying it's different okay. point made. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 As far as I know, it was just an upskirt. Yup. With a black square in front of the skirt to give the impression of nudity behind it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott! Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 Ummm fail. Haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildman Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 Wow, Perez Hilton is a dumbass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holleh Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 If its faked up it still constitutes as child porn.It doesnt matter if its real or not, the picture in question is still of an under ager. lol no. If it's fake, it's not real. Therefore, nothing can be done about it. It's not her vag we're looking at, it's somebody else's. I saw the photo today. Wow. It's being blown way outta proportion. It's FAKE. Jesus Christ you guys, ya'll need to calm down. I think it's funny how everyone is like OMG HE NEEDS TO GET A LIFE AND GET OUT OF EVERYONE ELSE'S. How about YOU guys get a life and get out of HIS. Hm? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watchthesky Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 he does need to get a life Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erin Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 he does need to get a life it's true.. so very true. I think it's funny how everyone is like OMG HE NEEDS TO GET A LIFE AND GET OUT OF EVERYONE ELSE'S. How about YOU guys get a life and get out of HIS. Hm? this is very contradictory seeing that you're getting in OUR (the people against him) lives now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RenegadeRoss Posted June 18, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 lol no. If it's fake, it's not real. Therefore, nothing can be done about it. It's not her vag we're looking at, it's somebody else's. I saw the photo today. Wow. It's being blown way outta proportion. It's FAKE. Jesus Christ you guys, ya'll need to calm down. I think it's funny how everyone is like OMG HE NEEDS TO GET A LIFE AND GET OUT OF EVERYONE ELSE'S. How about YOU guys get a life and get out of HIS. Hm? Do you honestly think that hasnt been thought about? Of course it's child porn. It's been interpretated to look as if She is flashing, therefor it is child porn. Whether it is fake or not. If this was allowed, there would be millions of fake naked pictures of miley cyrus over the internet, which compared to other celebs i bet there isnt, all because Miley is 17. Underage. Illegal. Meaning its Child Porn. Also your second statement? Everybody is calm, and it's called an opinon. No need to shout down other people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erin Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Do you honestly think that hasnt been thought about? Of course it's child porn. It's been interpretated to look as if She is flashing, therefor it is child porn. Whether it is fake or not. If this was allowed, there would be millions of fake naked pictures of miley cyrus over the internet, which compared to other celebs i bet there isnt, all because Miley is 17. Underage. Illegal. Meaning its Child Porn. Also your second statement? Everybody is calm, and it's called an opinon. No need to shout down other people. This is so full of truth. I asked my dad (detective sergeant) about the situation and he confirmed that it is, indeed, considered child porn and he could be charged. I also agree with your second statement Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XMusicDudetteX Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Unfortunately, there are so many freaking technicalities in the law that it's ridiculous. Either way, he needs to be charged with something that will put a pretty little dent in his name, as if he hasn't done so by himself already. Excuse me, did I say pretty little dent? I meant a huge damn crater. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erin Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Unfortunately, there are so many freaking technicalities in the law that it's ridiculous. Either way, he needs to be charged with something that will put a pretty little dent in his name, as if he hasn't done so by himself already. Excuse me, did I say pretty little dent? I meant a huge damn crater. It's true, but no matter what, a good D.A. could get a case against him. and I agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XMusicDudetteX Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 It's true, but no matter what, a good D.A. could get a case against him. and I agree. Hopefully they get a damn good D.A. on this case. I've seen way too many fuckers get off from a minute technicality and justice was never served. It's disgusting. But alas, there's nothing we the people can but to let the judicial system take effect. . . Or at least ACT as if it wants to take effect. If this was some random bitch from off the street doing what Perez did, we all know they'd be tossed to the lions, hahaha. Too many double-standards in this world, really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the1 Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 . I think it's funny how everyone is like OMG HE NEEDS TO GET A LIFE AND GET OUT OF EVERYONE ELSE'S. How about YOU guys get a life and get out of HIS. Hm? Shutup. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watchthesky Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Hopefully they get a damn good D.A. on this case. I've seen way too many fuckers get off from a minute technicality and justice was never served. It's disgusting. But alas, there's nothing we the people can but to let the judicial system take effect. . . Or at least ACT as if it wants to take effect.If this was some random bitch from off the street doing what Perez did, we all know they'd be tossed to the lions, hahaha. Too many double-standards in this world, really. too true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holleh Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 it's true.. so very true. this is very contradictory seeing that you're getting in OUR (the people against him) lives now Just trying to make a point, not argue. Shutup. No u~ This is so full of truth. I asked my dad (detective sergeant) about the situation and he confirmed that it is, indeed, considered child porn and he could be charged. I also agree with your second statement That's fucking bullshit. It doesn't make any sense at all whatsoever. Fucking law. Some asshole can rape a small fucking child and get away with fucking house arrest. Some retard on the fucking INTERNET posts a FAKE PHOTO of Miley Cyrus and everyone flips their god damn shit. Make no fucking sense at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.